#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Sao Paulo U2077013:245.3
2.Atletico-MG U2077014:174.4
3.Palmeiras U2077020:84
4.Santos U2077015:113.7
5.Athletico-PR U2077013:93.1
6.Cuiaba U2077013:93.1
7.America MG U2077010:102.9
8.Atletico GO U207706:122.6
9.Bahia U2077010:72.4
10.Ceara U2076114:133.9
11.Goias U2066012:113.8
12.Flamengo RJ U2066012:83.3
13.Botafogo U207619:102.7
14.Cruzeiro U206609:72.7
15.Corinthians U206603:112.3
16.Fluminense U207616:92.1
17.RB Bragantino U207616:82
18.Fortaleza U206604:61.7
19.Gremio U2055010:22.4
20.Internacional U204405:124.3
#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Sao Paulo U2077013:245.3
2.Atletico-MG U2077014:174.4
3.Palmeiras U2077020:84
4.Santos U2077015:113.7
5.Ceara U2076114:133.9
6.Athletico-PR U2076113:93.1
7.Cuiaba U2076113:93.1
8.America MG U2076110:102.9
9.Botafogo U207619:102.7
10.Goias U2065112:113.8
11.Flamengo RJ U2065112:83.3
12.Atletico GO U207526:122.6
13.Corinthians U206513:112.3
14.Internacional U204405:124.3
15.Gremio U2054110:22.4
16.RB Bragantino U207436:82
17.Cruzeiro U206339:72.7
18.Bahia U2073410:72.4
19.Fluminense U207346:92.1
20.Fortaleza U206334:61.7
#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Sao Paulo U2076113:245.3
2.Atletico-MG U2076114:174.4
3.Palmeiras U2075220:84
4.Ceara U2075214:133.9
5.Flamengo RJ U2065112:83.3
6.Botafogo U207529:102.7
7.Internacional U204405:124.3
8.Goias U2064212:113.8
9.Santos U2074315:113.7
10.Athletico-PR U2074313:93.1
11.Cuiaba U2074313:93.1
12.America MG U2073410:102.9
13.Atletico GO U207346:122.6
14.Bahia U2073410:72.4
15.Gremio U2053210:22.4
16.Fluminense U207346:92.1
17.Cruzeiro U206249:72.7
18.Corinthians U206243:112.3
19.RB Bragantino U207256:82
20.Fortaleza U206154:61.7
#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Sao Paulo U2076113:245.3
2.Atletico-MG U2075214:174.4
3.Palmeiras U2074320:84
4.Santos U2074315:113.7
5.Internacional U204315:124.3
6.Ceara U2073414:133.9
7.Goias U2063312:113.8
8.Flamengo RJ U2063312:83.3
9.Athletico-PR U2073413:93.1
10.Cuiaba U2073413:93.1
11.Fluminense U207346:92.1
12.Botafogo U207259:102.7
13.Cruzeiro U206249:72.7
14.Atletico GO U207256:122.6
15.Bahia U2072510:72.4
16.RB Bragantino U207256:82
17.America MG U2071610:102.9
18.Corinthians U206153:112.3
19.Gremio U2050510:22.4
20.Fortaleza U206064:61.7
#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Sao Paulo U2074313:245.3
2.Palmeiras U2074320:84
3.Atletico-MG U2073414:174.4
4.Ceara U2073414:133.9
5.Internacional U204225:124.3
6.Goias U2062412:113.8
7.Santos U2072515:113.7
8.Athletico-PR U2072513:93.1
9.Flamengo RJ U2061512:83.3
10.Cuiaba U2071613:93.1
11.America MG U2071610:102.9
12.Cruzeiro U206159:72.7
13.Atletico GO U207166:122.6
14.Bahia U2071610:72.4
15.Botafogo U207079:102.7
16.Gremio U2050510:22.4
17.Corinthians U206063:112.3
18.Fluminense U207076:92.1
19.RB Bragantino U207076:82
20.Fortaleza U206064:61.7
#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Sao Paulo U2074313:245.3
2.Atletico-MG U2072514:174.4
3.Ceara U2072514:133.9
4.Goias U2062412:113.8
5.Palmeiras U2071620:84
6.Santos U2071615:113.7
7.Cuiaba U2071613:93.1
8.America MG U2071610:102.9
9.Cruzeiro U206159:72.7
10.Bahia U2071610:72.4
11.Internacional U204045:124.3
12.Flamengo RJ U2060612:83.3
13.Athletico-PR U2070713:93.1
14.Botafogo U207079:102.7
15.Atletico GO U207076:122.6
16.Gremio U2050510:22.4
17.Corinthians U206063:112.3
18.Fluminense U207076:92.1
19.RB Bragantino U207076:82
20.Fortaleza U206064:61.7
#TeamMPOverUnderGG/MLast 5
1.Sao Paulo U2073413:245.3
2.Ceara U2072514:133.9
3.Atletico-MG U2071614:174.4
4.Goias U2061512:113.8
5.Santos U2071615:113.7
6.America MG U2071610:102.9
7.Cruzeiro U206159:72.7
8.Internacional U204045:124.3
9.Palmeiras U2070720:84
10.Flamengo RJ U2060612:83.3
11.Athletico-PR U2070713:93.1
12.Cuiaba U2070713:93.1
13.Botafogo U207079:102.7
14.Atletico GO U207076:122.6
15.Bahia U2070710:72.4
16.Gremio U2050510:22.4
17.Corinthians U206063:112.3
18.Fluminense U207076:92.1
19.RB Bragantino U207076:82
20.Fortaleza U206064:61.7